![]() Natesilver: On the latter front, The New York Times published a review that was fairly gracious - considering that Clinton (mostly deservedly, IMO) criticized the NYT a lot in the book. Micah: Well, the latter has ballooned into the former, right? Natesilver: Are we talking about coverage of Clinton overall? Or, like, reviews of the book itself? Lots of opportunity for reporters who have slammed President Trump to now slam Clinton to show that they are balanced, will criticize both sides, etc.Ĭlare.malone: Yeah, it’s totally fashionable to slam her on Twitter in a way that I do understand - she’s been around a long time, etc. There are lots of reporters who covered her. ![]() Perry ( Perry Bacon Jr., senior writer): I expected there would be a lot of coverage. ![]() She was one of the major players in the election, she’s entitled to her telling of things, she is the Democrat who got more votes, so she represents a sizable ideological chunk of the party, etc. I think this is a great laying out of all the reasons it's kinda wild that people want Hillary Clinton to shut up 1/ īut I’ll say again here: People who are out there saying that she should go quietly into the night are sort of being intellectually dishonest about what happens after campaigns.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |